Trump fires lead official in a first-of-its-kind action which sent shock waves through economic and political circles. President Donald Trump dismissed Dr. Erika McEntarfer, who at the time was the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), just hours after the agency put out poor employment reports which painted a very bad picture of the U.S. economy.
The Catalyst: Dismal Jobs Report
In the July report, we saw that the US economy only added 73,000 jobs which is way below the economic forecast of 110,000 for the month. Also of greater worry was that there were large scale revisions to May and June numbers which in total took out 258,000 jobs from what was previously reported.
These reports showed that May’s job growth fell from reported 144,000 to a mere 19,000 and in June we saw the reported 147,000 drop to only 14,000, which in turn showed that over the past three months the U.S. labor market had little to no growth, which averaged out at only 35,000 jobs a month.
Trump Outlines New Action in Unusual Move
“We are in need of precise Jobs Numbers. I have told my Team to remove this Biden Political Appointee right away.”
Trump fires lead official after alleging political bias and data manipulation. The president also put forth that McEntarfer had “doctored the Jobs Reports before the Election to improve Kamala’s [Harris’] chances of success,” which in turn boosted Democratic prospects in the 2024 race. However, it’s important to note that, at the time of his claims, no proof of data tampering had been presented.
Market Reaction and Economic Concerns
Weak economic reports and Trump’s large-scale reaction caused the markets to be very volatile. We saw all three main U.S. indices go down sharply, which included the Dow which fell over 500 points (1.2%), the S&P 500 which dropped 1.6%, and the Nasdaq which declined 2.3%.
The markets saw an increase in turmoil as at the same time Trump put in place wide-scale tariff increases which affected almost 70 countries and which saw rates between 10% to 40%. What had been scheduled to take off on August 1st was pushed back to August 7th but still the issue of uncertainty between investors and businesses remained.
Widespread Condemnation from Experts
The elimination of McEntarfer has brought in sharp criticism from economists, statisticians, and former government officials which run the gamut of political thought. William Beach, who was BLS commissioner during Trump’s first term, said the dismissal was groundless and that it does set a dangerous precedent which in turn devalues the statistical mission of the Bureau.
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers put forth that this is the action which we see in “authoritarian countries, not in democratic ones.” Also, he brought up that firing agency heads for publishing bad data whatsoever is to the benefit of breaking down democratic institutions. The Friends of BLS, which is an advocacy group made up of former commissioners and statistical experts, issued a press release stating this is a “baseless and damaging claim” that also goes after the great work and dedication of BLS personnel.
Trump Fires Lead Official: A Trend in Authoritarian Practices
Analysts have noted that Trump’s actions align with the pattern of what authoritarians do, which is to manipulate economic data in order to maintain control. We see that in authoritarian regimes — which are termed regimes where there is no free press and opposition — they tend to report GDP growth which is 1.15 to 1.3 times what in fact it is, as against what we see in democracies.
The issue at hand is that economic data is becoming a political issue, a base which supports free market operation and democratic governance. Michael Strain from the American Enterprise Institute put forth that government stats should be unbiased and of the highest quality, which in turn said that questioning data integrity is damage to the U.S.’s health.
The McEntarfer Legacy
Dr. Erika McEntarfer came into her post with a wealth of experience which she gained over the 20-year course of her career in different government agencies which included the Census Bureau, the Treasury Department, and the White House Council of Economic Advisers. She won confirmation in January 2024 by large bipartisan support which included current Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio when they were in the Senate.
Colleague after colleague reported that McEntarfer was a dedicated professional who also had a perfect record for data integrity. Also, former Labor Department chief economist Sarah Glynn said that McEntarfer had an excellent reputation for concern with the accuracy of the data and not for putting a political spin on her work.
Economic Data Under Siege
The issue brings to light that which is amiss in the approach of the Trump administration to federal statistical agencies. It is reported that the administration has done away with two important advisory groups which played a role in the quality and method of economic data. Also, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick put forth ideas on how Gross Domestic Product is to be calculated, which in turn has brought up issues of data manipulation.
BLS is to see a 20% cut in their budget which may in turn see the agency put an end to some very important data collection programs. At a time when we require accurate economic data to analyze the results of Trump’s trade policies and his economic impact, that is very much a concern.
Federal Reserve Implications
Weak economic reports and the ensuing debate have large scale implications for the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy. Before the report came out, the Fed had been keeping rates the same, which also saw Chairman Jerome Powell play it safe and delay rate cuts which he attributed to uncertainty brought on by tariff issues.
Following release of the jobs report, markets’ expectation for a September rate cut grew to about 81% from 38% pre-report. Also, some analysts are reporting that the Fed may put in a 50 basis point cut which they see as a way to avoid leaving rates too low for too long.
International Concerns
The issue of political influence playing a role in the reporting of U.S. economic data has worldwide implications as American economic data is used as a base by which the world measures and forms policy from. The U.S. has for long been the primary source of very reliable data which international markets and policymakers use as a benchmark.
Countries and international entities look to the U.S. for precise economic data which in turn they use in formulating their own policies and doing market analysis. Any attempt at manipulation or political influence may damage America’s economic preeminence on the global stage.
>> Get Latest News <<
News Sources:
